I’ve been taken to task in the past for characterizing my worldview as “conservative” despite the following scribbles:
* “opposing most conservatives on Terry Schiavo’s situation”:http://www.kyleandkelly.com/scribbles/politics_and_current_events/abducting_life/
* “criticizing a constitutional amendment on marriage”:http://www.kyleandkelly.com/scribbles/christianity/amendments_marriage_and_the_church/
* “positing that God is not a Republican”:http://www.kyleandkelly.com/scribbles/christianity/politics_and_religion/
Whether or not I’ve crossed the line to a liberal worldview is an issue for another post, but in short: I would posit that I’m critical of Christian conservative orthodoxy (if we can have neo-conservatives, we can have orthodox conservatives) because I care about the Christian viewpoint. I wouldn’t critique if I didn’t care. I want to make sure that what we bring to the world is well-thought out and truly consistent with God’s Word.
Why post this now? I don’t want to see Christian conservatives become radical zealots, and I think it’s a “very real and timely danger”:http://news.google.com/?ncl=http://olympics.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx%3Ftype%3DtopNews%26storyID%3D2005-08-23T172944Z_01_SCH362917_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-VENEZUELA-ROBERTSON-DC.XML&hl=en. What the heck was Robertson thinking? Am I being out of line in calling his statements “over the line”? Any conservatives out there who want to attempt a defense?
-
calvin
-
Jeremy





